Does the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 641 set out separate offenses or different means of committing one offense?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Does the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 641 — which makes it illegal to embezzle, steal, purloin, or knowingly convert to one’s own or another’s use property of the United States — set out separate offenses or different means of committing one offense? IL. Did the Fifth Circuit misapply the substantial-rights prong of plain-error review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) in contravention of the dictates of United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1993), and Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 (1946), by failing to consider the entire record to determine whether the improper admission of the highly prejudicial guiltby-association evidence about a defendant’s intent affected substantial rights where the sole defense to the charge of fraud was a lack of criminal intent? 1