Whether petitioner's argument under United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), deserves closer scrutiny

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER PETITIONER'S ARGUMENT UNDER UNITED STATES v. DAVIS, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019), DESERVES CLOSER SCRUTINY, WHERE . APPLYING THE SAME STANDARDS IN DAVIS, PROVES THAT BANK ROBBERY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) IS NOT A "CRIME OF VIOLENCE" FOR PURPOSES OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), BECAUSE IN ADDITION TO TAKING. MONEY FROM A BANK BY "FORCE AND VIOLENCE, OR BY INTIMIDATION," THE OFFENSE CAN [A]LSO BE COMMITTED BY THE MEANS OF ENTERING . A BANK "WITH INTENT TO COMMIT IN SUCH BANK... ANY FELONY AFFECTING SUCH BANK.. OR ANY LARCENY." : : (i)