No. 20-6744

Sinclair Ellis, Jr. v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : P ‘ ‘ +g Pa : — a. QUESTIONS : . Where as the District Court has 30 days on the Speedy Trial Clock to make a ruling on a pre-trial motion under §3161(H)(1)(J). If the Distreit Court take 90 days (without an,ends-of-Justice ruling on the record) to make a ruling on a Pre-Trial motion, is 60 days of the 90 days counted by the Speedy Trial. Clock? ) Where as if. the Speedy Trial 70 day time limit is in Question (under §3161(c)(1)) before the Petitioner enter a guilty plea,is the petitioner counsel held accountable for allowing 139.days to surpass the.Speedy ; Trial Act Limitation. Where as did the District Court error by not granting the Petitioner an C.0.A. when the Petitioner Speedy Trial rights was in Question? i iO)

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 1, 2021)

Attorneys

Sinclair Ellis
Sinclair Ellis — Petitioner
Sinclair Ellis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent