No. 20-675

Lone Star Silicon Innovations LLC v. Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 35-usc-311-312 35-usc-314 35-usc-318 administrative-law inter-partes-review judicial-review patent-invalidation patent-procedure patent-review patent-trial-and-appeal-board
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may invalidate patent claims based on a ground not asserted by the petitioner

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Any person, other than the patent owner, may request initiation of inter partes review proceedings against an issued patent, by filing a petition with the Patent and Trademark Office that identifies challenged claims and the grounds asserted for each challenged claim. 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-12. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB” or “Board”) decides whether to institute trial, based on the information in the petition and, if filed, a patent owner preliminary response. 35 U.S.C. § 314. At the conclusion of an instituted trial, the Board issues a final written decision determining the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner. 35 U.S.C. § 318. The questions presented are: (1) whether, in inter partes review proceedings, the Board may issue a final written decision that invalidates duly issued patent claims based on a ground not asserted by the petitioner in the corresponding petition; and (2) whether judicial review is available to remedy the Board’s unauthorized final decision invalidating those claims based on a ground not asserted in the petition.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent Iancu, Andrei to respond filed.
2020-11-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Iancu, Andrei
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Lone Star Silicon Innovations LLC
Timothy P. MaloneyFitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Petitioner
Timothy P. MaloneyFitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Petitioner