Does this Supreme Court grant and honor civil rights to all Arizonans and U.S. citizens?

No question identified. : | Questuns PRESENTED ZF Does this Supreme Court Grant and Honor LIVIL RIGHTS +o all Arizenans and US.Ci E so,1s Hasess KeELIEE | Lomedy thes a ELIEE appropriate tp __ A any ELmAMENTAL Cos Al ghts VicleHns and MAMEE st_M ae OE Fusrick,” proven_by ris Postiti “By Vitoe ta Uys a US. Citisen Liprisaned For _/ 7 years Flat, just because the bower Courts ee him_have_his BRADY EIDE ACE “of he hon ay DMeE<10M, alleged tp t a. Ls egal Police Recording en |2-03| Vy is Mrluhldeep Tmpei hi deep —Linprisoned hil } i Demed his” Civil RicHTs “ hile hens Lak ath rm 7 [TS guaranteed by te i id-0n. wi onde x EM Amendment Rights on — a is tight to No Unlawful Seacch,Righ ) Be A_Wiitness against Sell’, Right to Mins , WaRwiues and Bight to have Counse es Oo ave. Counsel Present ? | din“ FAREr TA V CAL as Held Right +o Self -Represente — Greg 4 a Right to Contesl Ones own Defense’? | LE trial Jidge Denied Un WaldeepS Unequie= . dacle_request Te Kepreseatthmself_on 23-03-2016 pi thea Forced lim to Coa lenmnediarens [a Teldt | on OF-0b-Jolb, with Forced-Upon Pubhic Detendec whe was totally Hostile and Inethective, Would Ithis_Consthole a 6" Amead. Violation unde Ruling _WSict “Eanerta VCAR = _NHEARIMC, before outright Dental of their Bight __IHo beld in“ FAgerta’CAt | LAw,it he has been? Denied 21 “Motions _W For Production of Estublished Record, ‘Denied “38 “Motons For An EvibeamAay HEARING” and then, Denied “Motion To Shp | , BRADY Viel ATOMS by US Osh? 7 ay vePeocess been Violeted if Distt Denied | oti na — and Without Reviewing Claims on ORIGINAL Petifen @ : Wi and, 373 U5,33,87 Sct Cl: 963) and Milk eV Kyan, Anz me WE2dC Fein 2013)"An Unreasonable Determinahion | tide Wallon) fan Missive KEY ASPECTS lok (Mr laldreps) Kecord by Dist.Ct Denying his £2 82054 Heheas Pedibion and COA, With 2UT Peckivesl | 4) Can the Voluntwiness of Gutty PLEA be challenged OM BRADY CROWDS, as held in White PV US ase Badsel SMe (988) S54 DP NG hold A_Certikicate Of Appealability Ge Granted if agpellent has Been Denied his BRAY LE ADEM CE 2) Ten Criminal Proceedings, transects ; epocts listed in _Agpendix Ce, and ther “DEMED HL. court Liled Motions To Produce. Records; whch All Prove his Cowsti naar VieLArions¢ @__Does this Sct believe*A Reasonable. Sunt | | Coure Degare” whether FAILURE ty PRESENT pa appellaatand Reviewing Courts fis Denied NERA EWibECE, meet the. low threhbhild to ee | nM this Supt. Ruled in” Strickler V Greene | | (326314. S.C4, 19301999) Hat “A. defendant may | Eile A224 Successive 52254 HAGEAS PETITION. lbindee “BRADY Woesmonl" because Islithald Evid | lence Constitited “ CAUSATION, even ALler a. Figst : _ 52254 HABEAS has Been DEMED, then Locic loranted a Fins COA, and HABEAS Review by | | tof Appeals, on this Aypellants BRAY Grows? Did the Gilbect Bice violate the 4” ane __te M4 Amend ments,aod_ SExceus vary Rue’ by | having Mo_ CLEA HANDS EXCEPTION “fo their electronic record ingen 12-03-2013, usithart Wleccon | lo MiRAWWA \AMABMIMG, MO COUNSEL r Hyis_snKnowing lee Stdte haul” and yore. of Plice Det Ralp | MCornejo telling on recording what bis_govb acer can ISAY, and_Wthed She Could MoT SAY, while he mode he Litt of FF specific_allegatins nal minvke | Kall tecarding? Che. Audle_ch =ia.evidence -Denied WAKA 0: Rneblce ca Tensile ad hope Vp) to) Why was PERTURED TESTIMONY “given ly Shite , bo Ge é AND Tue, [a2 and Simesam Heating tases | a COA, ard first De NowoK ‘euciew, Se fo_infeationJ ally nove this Sct to Contirm Nationally J Settled Federw| Laws of A) Denied Bh tp Self (c) Denied Presumption of Innocence. Z _ (2) Denied Rt. te Only Be Found Guilty By Fost ___| Beyond A Reasonable Doubt? J ED) Denied RA tp Efbectiie Assistance ot Counsel? (FE) Denied Rt ty a Knowing, Voluntary Plea? J (G) Denied Rb +t. Plea _Negetiahions withe of LAW and Fact? 2) Why did Distct refise + Pillow FRCP 8854) “Shall Order the state tr prrduce. any missing or relevant pact ot petboner’ record”? _ @) Have Murano Bievrs_attached when