No. 20-6752

Juan Tinoco-Garcia v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process immigration immigration-law judicial-advisement non-citizen non-citizen-rights padilla-v-kentucky post-conviction-relief removal-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an immigration judge's failure to advise an immigrant in removal proceedings of their apparent eligibility to seek post-conviction relief under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 360 (2010), and its progeny violate a non-citizen's right to due-process

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does an immigration judge’s failure to advise an immigrant in removal proceedings of their apparent eligibility to seek post-conviction relief under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 360 (2010), and its progeny violate a non-citizen’s right to due process? prefix

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Juan Tinoco-Garcia
Nora Kelly HirozawaFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Nora Kelly HirozawaFederal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent