1. Whether the Ninth Circuit's application of the inevitable discovery exception—without requiring any factual basis to support it—is contrary to this Court's precedents and so far departs from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for the exercise of this Court's supervisory powers.

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit's validation of a warrant authorizing the search for and seizure of all electronic devices within a residence, without requiring that they be connected to any suspect or criminal activity, based only the observed presence of a suspect at that residence, is contrary to this Court's precedents and the decision of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in United States v. Griffith, 867 F.3d 1265 (D.C. Cir. 2017).

Whether the Ninth Circuit's application of the inevitable-discovery-exception