Whether the Georgia Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review the petitioners' case, and whether the collateral order denying the petitioners' motion to strike is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ovder denying a motion to strike pursuant . occas qnf HLS is divectly appealable Paad whether the Georgia Court of Appeals ad _furisdiciion to rev pelitioners Cae. , al courts order denying the Pefitioners — ' -gen Mie) ce motion ts cHechey unre wain on 7 eal from a final ju went, and whether the cdlateval at hone the leqa) and practical value oF which would be a destroyed WE not Vindicated befre trial . timer was denied equal protectionof the | > he svant to United Stetes boncthtution , Amendment