Whether the court committed error by declining to resentence the petitioner under Section 3582(c)(2) when the court earlier reduced the petitioner's 'guideline' level but not the statutory penalty, thereby resulting in the petitioner's statutory maximum range conclusion

No question identified. : . Question ( 5) Presented : . TE Ushether the court Comm ted error boy Peotining “+o " vesente nce” We per onen oo ; Linder secon You &t he Fresh te AA . oo, Whea tHe Cour eacler reduced the Gelb cnexs . “ Quideline.* \evel “Bud NOt tne SOO : Poway “Where, Pes Vk NG vn tne, pedihoners . Stodton Max mor mAAQe exceediog \vs i ; List Pores . A bre Hogien of Mae case onthe Cover poge. Tobie of Contents Guestion(d Presented SY . Opinionis> Bean . Se a : “Aurisdickon . a Constitutional and Statue provisions iwdved .. . . VO, Table of Aulhornties 20, a YZ “ , oo “Procedural “Posture . . te, i a Nu : . Statement ¢ Me Cose, _ CAeasens Ry Granting Hie act ES) Question (8) Presentect ZT Whether th Court Committed egg oy deelning es “Ye semtence” thre Pekioner Under Sechon You Gf Re Viest Step Aer When the court carter reduced he | ; pethioners “ guideline" \evel “Bur wot dn Srotudeny Percatey —Hrereloy, Tesuling in he Potions Storuton, Max MN Tonge Conduson 2 er) Please. reherto