No. 20-6761
Wayne Wells, Jr. v. Terrie Wallace, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-of-consent civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence-rules sentencing statutory-interpretation trial-procedure witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the statute SC Code Ann. 8 10-3655 (8)(2) have unconstitutional requirements?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does the. Statute. SC Code Ann, 8 1o-3655 (8)(2) has om item Yequiremens ! Le Could the. $sote remove. the. element “to toevce. Som She Starute. Ond prosecute becouse. the Pesiioner was older than the Victim 2 Ss boas Trial Counsel's Seilure to obiect to the trial juelges answer to Hhe jur's question an misnnderstonding o& the. lew 4, Was Pedi Honey entitled tow mistale. oF Age. thesense. aS A olSirmadive deSense. ! |
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Wallace, Warden to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Wallace, Warden
Melody Jane Brown — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Melody Jane Brown — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent