No. 20-6763

Arnold Maurice Mathis v. Zulaika Zoe Vizcarrondo

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compensatory-damages false-arrest fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment qualified-immunity statute-of-limitations warrantless-search
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit correctly dismissed Petitioners Counts ILand IIL of the Original Complaint for false arrest on the basis that the Counts are barred by the statute of limitations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit correctly dismissed Petitioners Counts ILand IIL of the Original Complaint for false arrest on the basis that the Counts are barred by the statute of limitations. Whether the Court of Appeal s for the Eleventh Circuit correctly dismissed the Second Amended Complaint on the basis that Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity on Petitioners claim that a warrantless search was conducted of Petitioners cellphone in vi olation of his rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments where no exigency is shown. Whether itis ever a lawful discretionary function for a | person's personal password encrypted cellphone to be breached without owners consent or abandonment and no ext gency. Whether the Petitioner 15 entitled to compensatory and/or punitive damages in this action.

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent Zulaika Vizcarrondo to respond filed.
2020-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Arnold Mathis
Arnold Maurice Mathis — Petitioner
Arnold Maurice Mathis — Petitioner
Zulaika Vizcarrondo
Jonathan Barnet TrohnCampbell Trohn Tamayo & Aranda, PA, Respondent
Jonathan Barnet TrohnCampbell Trohn Tamayo & Aranda, PA, Respondent