No. 20-6768
Quentin Watson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights clearly-established-law district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction fifth-circuit judicial-procedure legal-evaluation petition-review standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied clearly established law in evaluating petitioner's claims?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the United States District Court, Eastem District of Louisiana and Fifih Cireuit Court of Appeals mis-applied clearly established law in evaluating petitioner's claims?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2020-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Vannoy, Warden
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent