No. 20-6777
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy criminal-evidence criminal-law criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidence fourth-circuit rico rico-conspiracy sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Government produced sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Petitioner's actions were part of a Rico Conspiracy
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the Government produced sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Petitioner’s actions were part of a Rico Conspiracy. Il. Whether the District Court erred at the sentencing hearing in its interpretation of the sentencing guidelines which resulting in an unreasonable sentence of the Petitioner. i
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2021)
Attorneys
James Baxton
Matthew C. Joseph — Law Office of Norman Butler, Petitioner
Matthew C. Joseph — Law Office of Norman Butler, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent