Whether Defendants discriminated against Petitioner and deprived him of Equal Protection and Due Process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether Defendants named above i.e., Lloyds of London lic, Certain Underwriters llc, Wow Burgers llc, Checkers store 106, Checkers Drive-In Rest. Inc., Angel Didios, (Franchise Owner), which are private entities, and City of Tampa, a Government agency all discriminated against Petitioner and deprived him of Equal Protection as well Due Process under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? 2. Whether Petitioner had a constitutional right of notice and right to be present and heard during an October 1 2019 critical :proceeding-upon Defendants’ above Motions-+to Dismiss Petitioner's Second Amended Complaint? . 3. Whether Petitioner had constitutional right to have an evidentiary hearing on Motion to Vacaté and Set Aside Order for which was erroneously summarily ‘ denied thus depriving Petitioner right to be heard; a second time resulting into double procedural error conflicting 2d DCA’s own precedent as well, every other Florida District Court. : 4. Whether Florida’s PCA Doctrine of Judicial Administration (based on the Florida Constitution, Article V) permitted Second DCA to conflict its own law on this subject and as well other district courts and this Court’s law, as applied, and fails to provide Florida citizens including Petitioner equal protection guarantees under the 14th Amendment and due process protections under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. question of great public interest and importance? . \ Pp. TO P iG Petitioner is Leon Bright. Respondents are Certain Underwriters lic., Lloyds of London Cnsurer) Judge Paul A. Huey (state trial judge), Wow Burgers lic, Angel Didios et al., represented by Taylor Kaufman P.A. : [x] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ‘