No. 20-6800
Tags: brady-rule brady-v-maryland constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence favorable-evidence materiality prosecutorial-disclosure prosecutorial-misconduct trial-fairness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How does a court determine whether evidence that the prosecution did not share with the defense before trial is 'favorable' under the standard announced in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED How does a court determine whether evidence that the prosecution did not share with the defense before trial is “favorable” under the standard announced in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)? -1
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent