No. 20-6803
Dominic Lindsey v. United States
Tags: case-conflict certiorari court-order criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-precedent legal-compliance precedent supreme-court supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the opinion below conflicts with this Court's decisions in Witte v. United States and Davis v. United States, and whether it adequately complies with this Court's order?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the opinion below conflicts with this Court’s decisions in Witte v. United States, 515 U.S. 389 (1995), and Davis v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020), and whether it adequately complies with this Court’s order? ii
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Dominic Lindsey
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent