No. 20-6855

Stacia O'Neil v. Marisa Berquist, et al.

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2021-01-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-review arbitration commercial-disputes due-process uniform-arbitration-act
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court of the State of Massachusetts denied the Petitioner Due Process of Law under the 14th Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW e@ Whether The Supreme Court of the State of Massachusetts denied the Petitioner Due Process of Law under the 14th Amendment, when it denied a timely filed Application For Further Appellate Review in a matter where the Petitioner did not receive Due Process in an Arbitration matter? e Whether the Supreme Court of the State of Massachusetts incorrectly applied the State of Massachusetts’ Uniform Arbitration Act for Commercial Disputes when it denied a timely filed Application For Further Appellate Review in a matter where the Petitioner did not receive Due Process in an Arbitration matter? e

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-15
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stacia O'Neil filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Marisa Berquist to respond filed.
2021-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut to respond filed.
2020-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2021)

Attorneys

Marisa Berquist
Teri Ann McHughBoyle, Shaughnessy & Campo, P.C., Respondent
Stacia O'Neil
Stacia O'Neil — Petitioner
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
John Philip GraceffaMorrison Mahoney LLP, Respondent