Whether a federal court is required to apply controlling state law in determining whether facts omitted from a warrant application vitiate probable cause

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether a federal court is required to apply controlling state law in determining whether facts omitted from a warrant application vitiate probable cause, where the inclusion of those facts would have precluded issuance of the warrant in the jurisdiction where the warrant was obtained. 2. Whether the Court should resolve the circuit split between the Eighth and Eleventh Circuits on one side, and the Second and Third Circuits on the other, regarding whether the First Amendment right to access the Internet recognized in Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 8. Ct. 1730 (2017), applies to persons on supervised release. i INTERESTED PARTIES AND RELATED PROECEDINGS There are no