Whether the State of Georgia's use of constructive custody imposes unusual hardship and deprives the litigant of protections guaranteed by the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments

Questions presented for review 1) Whether the State of Georgia’s use of constructive custody, i.e., constraining the liberty of a litigant to petition for redress while simultaneously tampering with the court record(s) in a litigant’s cases, imposes unusual hardship and deprives the litigant of protections guaranteed by the First. Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution while also constituting a refusal by the State of Georgia to provide a Georgia litigant a “plain, speedy, and efficient” remedy, abrogating OCGA § 9-2-3(b) which states that "For every right there shall be a remedy," as well as Art. I, Sec. II, Par. I, of the Constitution of Georgia of 1983 states "Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people ; and are at all times amenable to them," i ‘ , A list of all