Did the United States Court of Appeals err in failing to issue a Certificate of Appealability from the denial of the Petition for writ of habeas corpus as concerns (a) the State Trial Court's granting of a 'Vacatur' motion multiple times that vacated a previous Order by a different judge allowing the Petitioner to withdraw his guilty pleas on remand from the Georgia Supreme Court while he was represented by Counsel thus divesting the Court of jurisdiction and necessarily creating a structural defect in the criminal proceeding per Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 416 (2013), where the only available mechanism for such a claim would have been a Petition for writ of habeas corpus; and (b) the appointed trial Counsel's complete failure to conduct any pre-trial investigation in a death penalty case where Counsel submitted a 'forfeiture motion' without Petitioner's knowledge, maintains in the motion that the trial court did not follow 'Faretta' protocol because the Petitioner had stated on the record that he was withdrawing his guilty pleas and did so 'pro-se' contrary to the facts and the record where the Petitioner was represented by Court-appointed Counsel

No question identified. : : _Qossrton) — Peesented VDid the United States Cot of alfeats fav the Hewes Cut ev in filing to ISve a Cerkfade of aPhealabiltt fom the oknial of the > Dedtton for udeit of habeas CorPuS as Concerns 5 a) the. Stede Hla Court's Granting of a \Eacettn” motion multiPe terms aut-atCourt Uhre Vatated a Previans Ader bY a diferent chile B/lowing the Petitioner +p witthdies his dutty fleas pn Remand From the Greadin SuPreme Court bile he was rePesented _ by Counsel thus diveShad the Court of urisditchin anc necessarily Lreading SHuctuet defect tr the. Criminal Porecht Vi Ab 1 507 US bIG C1493), there the. Anl¥ l40A chide of mechmism for Suth aa Sue would have. heen A Petitiin fw Wat of habeos LorhuS ; and } b) Ae abPiinted trial Counsel's Lowblete. Gillure bs Conduct any He. wf a Predrial investidafinn in «@ deodn Penetty Lase there in the ConveySe » Counsel Submitttd a “foreta moffin lthout Ped Muner's Gomledje.» maintains ‘In the. wotia Hd the. bvitfnel hearlng cludte. Ai not fbllow "Eavelle” Prshicol betas the Pefiiner bGUY Shited on the record That he wus Withdiawind his dty Meas anal . did Sd “Pa-SE" Shih 7S Combaly dy the facts aac the eon a the Petitioner Was eheSented by Coutt-albiinted {