Whether Florida's postconviction procedures governing intellectual-disability claims fail to vindicate defendants' substantive Eighth-Amendment rights, such that it constitutes a violation of due-process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Florida’s postconviction procedures governing intellectual disability claims fail to vindicate defendants’ substantive Eighth Amendment rights, such that it constitutes a violation of due process? 2. Whether this Court’s decision in Hall v. Florida, 134 8. Ct. 1986 (2014), announced a new substantive rule, such that it must be applied retroactively by state courts under Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 8. Ct. 718 (2016). i