Macho Joe Williams v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Appellant's motion to review a 2019 order
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , F i. OD The Tela court Abuse rhe Ooteten When fe Denied Apellants Medidme To Sesvew a, OF9 The Tetal Cont Commis Reversible Evvou” when te Fail To HelO A Hear ‘ng, RegaurDing DeferBant® Sofo® Attorneys ConFlick oF Lntiest on® shen He FAleOTS Discharge Sold®AMerney One To Ker Prewiors Representation oF Appellant f 3. O19 The Trt coaorl Evo in failing $0 Enhey-A TaQhewrent Oe Aegrittes 008 /or Commating Aipelank’s obotisn for a Aled Thiel See TnsuAk dent EviSeue Was fresonteD ? A. Whether the cousk in 6 manag ahe sentences for some of the courte ( 5 . oe ConSeenkloe to othe Vislai the. probibivons of ARS. 58 (3-iIL and thug lm posed Wegak Zenlences ? 5. Whether dial and orpoe lade, Counsel wefe ineffective For Failing 40 object +o of Coise the Issue te Sentencing oor concerming the IM pos tow OF emseembloe Sentences an® jwiak counsels neglect ing +0 owe 5ele's attorney SischaryeD Sue to hey previous Vepresentation oF Appellant ?