Phillip A. Benjamin v. Florida
DueProcess
Did the Trial Court err when limiting the testimonies of the defense witness from testifying of vital information, therefore, hindering the Defendant from defending himself thus depriving the Defendant of a fair trial and due process that guaranteed in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
QUESTIONS PRESENTED —s—SC~—S 1. Did the Trial Court err when limiting the testimonies of the defense witness from testifying of vital information, therefore, hindering the Defendant from defending himself thus depriving the Defendant of a fair trial and due process that guaranteed in the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. 2. Did the Trial Court err in allowing an indigent Defendant to be convicted of a non-existent and non-statutory charge in the body of the information depriving the Defendant due process of being aware of the correct charges, a clear violation of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the US. Constitution. 3. Did the Trial Court err in allowing the striking of a particular cognizable group of people from the jury depriving the Defendant of an impartial jury of a cross section of his community violating his due process and equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.