Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's federal petition for writ of habeas corpus based on a time bar procedure that commands the United States district court to refrain from proceeding on the merits of a time bar

No question identified. : ” QUESTIONS PRESCU TED , : de ARE SeuLue vi DEW, $13 Li.5. 29% aes, A * SUPERSEDE AS * ALTUAL IMAL ENCE GATEWAY CLAIVI” THAT Govema THE COPIMmDR = LAUd WRIT OF WaGina« Loepus LOMIM ANDI Mt A LEBAL STAM BF PROLEED/AUIG anl A TIME BAR PRO2EDURE BAIL LOMIMANDS We UMITED STAM DIS T2467 COURT YO REERAWS FLOM PRGLEEDING Od THE MenZzTs OF A Tims Ban’? 2. ROA UMitED S7AT2E Dis7Teict Leer ELLER HAVE TUR APPRO AL PnOm. Tus Const 76“ Seared’ * sPaRaten | > SerzeD": “suppress; “wir BR, AND DEXTHLY” A PETIT OMERS FEDEMAL PETITION FOR WRIT Of UbBE~ AX CORPUS Pribe Te THE E\LiINis OS TIE APPLILA Sul % : B. WHEN PETIVIONZE OBLIGATED BY La Zo Lan TINUE THE LITIGATION ON THE PETITION FON UsRAT OF HARASS Corpus AFTER PATI JOE IMBewm THE DISTRICT Couiy Onl PEs Feast AMERMOMIinIT VIb~ Lariat TO TNE UNITED STATE LousTiTutinas 7 Aw wend THE UNITED STateE Laut 6F APPEDLE Fer THE Mine TW Gtheury OBLIGATED BY Cau? To STAY THE PROCEEDING Asm &oRIDULT A CARE PENDEAT bsvacs Ti Golet tons “ALT THE ALLE @ATIENS BF MIT COA DU~ ; Lt Mi Tide DIL TNILT LOURT BE TER PETITIOAER Mi dirt THE NIRMTH Zinta PRIOR TO THE DIZMLISSAL tor “HE PEvitiad Poo iRI7 OF MABERS Conrus ON “THI LOASSTITUTioal AL Violations 7 5. SHOULD PeTIZioeR HAVE BEEN ALLOWED —THELEVIDENT IARY MIARING WE REAUESTEN OF THE DISTRILT COURT bi WS bABERS PETIT IO ; . MOCKEMiA Faw THE PURPOFE BF ATTEMPLAN, TO DETEEMING UME THER wit ALLEGSTIBOAL INVeELVED ARZUSIAG TA OrTeteT couRT LI" “ThE FouURTIH cin) . AMEMD MET Violeta OF REMOVE PET rioEICS METIORAANUM OF PoyaLTZ fold AuTeRITie sal SueraaT OF TNE PE TT od FOR VWiRAT OF HABER Coreus! lo. IM ACCORD L FEDERAL Ann CLowsTITuUTIDVAL Law ARE §% uUrcdce. C.8.2iNe, AsO LS.tik. Teeridad 113 Fue FaeDeel, AND CONST TI7 UTIEN AL Peovisiowds Phevines Fon C2imes CommiareD Wirnias THE TERREITORN Oe Tad UNITED STuTret OF AMETSZA, Ads LE To ART PETITIBMRR ealTe TE TO AS PUNITNED IN ALLERDING To THE SURDIVI Kod OF TidAy Lard iM q. WHETLE PET TioaieR EMTITLEDR To RE LuAReE wird TH Laz SB! PETTY Mite mented, OF ENSE FOE SLAM ASA Ait GiniPmeua Jl THE FALE THRE Yo FIVE TiVIES AUD Te Blows SPLIT / ar BRUISE THE tolRi~ RGEND 2 idan urea We? a. WHEE Tudia. A Brady toa awruTione. SUPVEUSSION viclaTi nal CAUge BY TUE UBLALOFUL REMOVAL Of THI RIERLET TER CONS TITU TDMAL BVIDE~ ace 2 A. WARE THON AM ALY OF DELIMRATE js JAVIDIGUS DIT LRA AK wise IM Tue eFadteemenie OF Lala COMMITTED AY THe UATE STATES Ps TUT Loui Kor wae RHAVIKAL Dis vRitg7 we bat imusaaita BY Tui Malq LAuIRUL SEARIH Ane SEIZURE OF PeTrrioneR 3S MEr1emaN Duo Gil Pirtatrt AUD AUTHORITIE? Jnl SuPPeiedT OF TAR Prrviriend Far wart oF WARGAZ corpus? Cis , “TABLE OF COAITENTS : Quteriaus Peirs 27TED . 179.03 es * “TARLE Of AGYWORITIES . VID OD OPI / DMS BELOLS .. : j C—O TJURISDizriaa , $2 See ey CONFPTITUTIAMAL ANG Sear ORT : _— PROVISION IaivoLVeN 2 wo kat 45 STATEMENT. __ _ . 2 ofA 4aiS th REREGUES FOR GRATING THE PETLTLDA : LIT AB 61% 2021.22 Pi SUPREME COUT SHOULD GRAAIT “has PETITiow ‘TO MARA TUE Fintat DETe2AT (NAT iC ON WHETHE “pu PETIT) arieer L148 GAVEN THE OF POR TUMST y 710 peesem'y WIS FEDERAL PETIT bal FOR WRIT OF WAREAS : : COR MULE TO THE UALTED STNTES DISTRICT COUILT ; Pon TUE CENTRAL DISTRICT OK CALIFORANN, wie . Aci OF FiziAe OF THE LounT Fook 17 bP bat Mite Sek /HARSALK TO UM LAY PULLY REMOVE THE MEMALANDGM OF POINTS AMD AGTHORITIES PAl Stempo RT &E TE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS . Eéneus REPORE THE FILING OF TOE APPLICWTION . PETITION ASSERT FO ihe 23; FouRti AMEN RmMent, “aAild (SRLOMABLEWESS (A/ GERERAL > AD» ANY. ZOD , COATS TITUTION AL VIOLATION fal SER~ Rew AND S@IZURE CASE IS COMPLETE Lonel Sevens meniy OFMIRIALS MAKE UNLAISPUL SERRE : oe SEVLURE 1 LORRLED LON FES Io CASE sat LOM TRAST, PLAY IMveLve rerkE Then ONE 2OMSei TieudaL VIBLATION Aatd, WHERE IT DOLE “TAS~ ESE Violett pas Way Been AT DIEFERENT Times ; aaa BY MIFPERENMT ACTIONS « UriSitiAe CONST AMENDS, 4,5 7 US. Vs GQWAILAA 743 SUPE : ‘2d BUD. COALCLU SIONS . 24 ao