No. 20-6917

Frank McAfee v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure counsel-performance fifth-circuit ineffective-assistance insufficient-record legal-standard procedural-dismissal sixth-amendment specific-objection strategic-reasons
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Fifth Circuit fail to follow its own law and that of other circuits when it dismissed Mr. McAfee's appeal alleging ineffective assistance because of the government's claim that the record was insufficient to give counsel a chance to advance possible strategic reasons for his failures where there could be no valid reasons for failing to specifically object?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT FAIL TO FOLLOW ITS OWN LAW AND THAT OF OTHER CIRCUITS WHEN IT DISMISSED MR. MCAFEE’S APPEAL ALLEGING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNMENT’S CLAIM THAT THE RECORD WAS INSUFFICIENT TO GIVE COUNSEL A CHANCE TO ADVANCE POSSIBLE STRATEGIC REASONS FOR HIS FAILURES WHERE THERE COULD BE NO VALID REASONS FOR FAILING TO SPECIFICALLY OBJECT. LIST OF ALL PARTIES The undersigned counsel of record certifies that all

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Frank McAfee
Julie Ann Epps — Petitioner
Julie Ann Epps — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent