No. 20-6928
Tags: credibility credibility-determination due-process fifth-amendment out-of-court-identification reliability revocation revocation-hearing supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Does a district court violate a defendant's due process rights by relying solely on an uncorroborated, recanted, out-of-court identification to revoke his supervised release when the court has no basis for finding the initial accusation credible or reliable?
(2) Did the revocation of Mr. Ivey's supervised release violate his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a district court violate a defendant's due process rights by relying solely on an uncorroborated, recanted, out-of-court identification to revoke his supervised release when the court has no basis for finding the initial accusation credible or reliable?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Timothy Ivey
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent