No. 20-6931
Christopher Shawn Landreneau v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: burden-of-proof circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process evidence fifth-amendment presentence-report sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court may require a defendant to present his own evidence refuting a presentence investigation report's factual claims leading to a Sentencing Guideline enhancement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED | Whether a district court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the | Fifth Amendment and Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, | require a defendant to present his own evidence refuting a presentence inves| tigation report’s factual claims leading to a Sentencing Guideline enhance| ment-—as the First, Fifth, and Sixth Circuits allow-—or may not-——as the Second, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have held. | | | | 1
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-03-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Christopher Landreneau
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent