No. 20-6937

Darris Altony Newsome v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy fourth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mistrial parole
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in dismissing the petitioner's writ of habeas corpus as unauthorized and successive

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : No: 20-6) 80(L) Ne 20-6674 a | (1: 20-¢V-000 50-Lo~ TCR C1!26~ C¥00056-LOTCB, | Tx The Suaaeme Court ot The Untted States ae | Vo. ‘lo be supplied by Ces pisses. $$ Be raheem | ECESSARY to Resolve Any MAeRAl Tack which ARE oR May be bispute Nitga bo o)654(Q)) states * ut the habeas cla: Ea be Tully determined ow the basis of Reconded patyers the Court : If mikes it detawiation wheter such wrt should issue on the hance oF the Retard 7 hj ai be hab claims Unt hoe Fully detenMined on the basis of the aeord, Further mene unless he éopondewt Accepts AM ot the aetbinehe Factual prot Fers there Kul oe matenial Taehual iat depute And these: dispute cane be Resdved by A simple REVIEW oF the wad. Thus the Re Sol upon Fis If ch_diomrtes Aust nel J& A _evludan of The yi dene were lact sides MANE AN o7PaRt it © PRESENT Ev) c “NCE (N lsupoart 0% Wen Respect rositians And challenge the Assen ons Hose po disagree. The oetwner Resoeet 4 AEpRie se Ws that i In EVid ENT AR A EARING 19 NECESSARY 4 Aegolye ANY ‘Actual disputes If nicl MAN ARSE And to vinide Deh Hoven the oppert unity fo DRovE hh strled Giounds Fe habers Reheh see United shales v Mane ue ; F.3d 949 G03 0.4 Gi" Ga. 14tKobstavi tut cWims ff ine Bech ven ess ondinarlly CANN be Resdved without An evideabiasny hearing). a | ce Also United States y. MAGIN 973 F 2d Zol 204 Cu C2, 1992 ts unt nA habeas pavcecding must held An evidentiary hear Alben the aetfionen Alleges Tacks which 17 true would ewk tLe hin he Relies), _ | hs the United States SUPREME Count -has declar dj HERE 45 Ne | Taher duby of A court under aut constitu btonal System tha the IF aetul phoce ssing_Aaid bdiuc cAlion oF Petitions Fox_weit ot habeas Itonous a itis nL such rueredings that A deRsoN IN custody chargus | Mb ERMWR NE \ect ot evil puipase has Arsulted tw his unlawSy ewtite wicnt_aid shat he is depived of his Treedom CoubRAny ts law” [Hanns Nelson, 294 U.S 208, 2700 91¢) 7n chart AN evidentiary henna hs AecessAny bo A Fan and aut leheaaablio ot pebibineds alas | : F A\ Ms J Rese etutly Suited | | | || | | | | 242 _heQuest Fox Opal Adgument | | PebboneR ReQuest to present onal AAGuMEmt ok the Motions _ oe pexdivg before this HovorAble Court due 4o Wo paaly shall bé | de gived of the opportu nity to present its position ow the wenits | The a motion fe Asoune TaigNes fo All paahies. _ a | | This A vocal concerns the issues of the Commonwealth LAdked | Roballe cause to initiate CRiMINAl Rocerding And Failed to withdaaw ; laznest watnauts AF eR leaaxing tet No enime had beer committed. | | Connon -alth aResented eA[URY test mony ot the Allequd welim hut Failed to compeet it whieh had AN effect ow the judgment of The court ptoceeding be use wt involved A OARUpHON ot the | auth secking Function ob the Rial PROCESS, _ : {| Gommonwerth Hive 2¢ sHoNER wAs ARRested on Ape /Ag otvtled = _|besunl Battery changes iNEHEEN years eARlien, And daopped all _ | Heharoes due fo conFheling lates of offense and the Fuck that ule lates were Bwily Fated st wae defeRuined that schiViaied _ Ad INCARCERAbEd during that pantioulg time _ | inal counsel Tailed +o jubersiew And call Kowy witnesses that would [dises, dited €5 teskmony And ; ysicsl ENIGENCE hoAivist debtioncn. | ] TRAY Cougt tc Red by denied 2 etitonen Motion Tor A Mistaial, | t HONEA claim, Wet Guilly al CHMAGES And Ozh | ARGUiAENE would p sist the Count determing the merits of the j able oF Contents ance) : | eduest For Opal An UMENt, . ia | _ [finble oF Authorities _ sn ne egw iN Fansddiatl eet 4 : ate MENt oF The CASE a ws gg oa S Aha To Ampenidcces ee ee | pe ot in Gatien +{este ATE oMpARCE gk a ee SY , aLPode of Sepvte. 2 « « se ag 5 | = | Table oF Authoaities age) aaa | a | qe a a | | | Questions Pagsented” 1 Did. & Courts exred ix the opinion that aetibonens wart ak Inabeas ORDUS WAS choMisSé LAS UvAuthihized And SUCLESIVE fe de “ad Reliet 2 a 4 [The Qouble Teopandy Cuse ot the Fd Amendment stakes | nat No DERSoN shall be Subyect Yor the SAM

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-01-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Darris A. Newsome
Darris Newsome — Petitioner
Darris Newsome — Petitioner