No. 20-6942

Juan Jose Camarena v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3583 5th-amendment due-process fifth-amendment gang-affiliation liberty plain-error sentencing-conditions supervised-release vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is this condition of supervised release a violation of the Fifth Amendment due process right against vague conditions of release and/or a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(2)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Is this condition of supervised release a violation of the Fifth Amendment due process right against vague conditions of release and/or a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(2)?: You must not have any contact with anyone who belongs to or is affiliated with gangs or engaged in gang activity. AND Following this Court’s decisions in Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 1338 (2016), and Rosales-Mireles v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1897 (2018), is an unlawful condition of supervised release necessarily reversible plain error? i

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Juan Jose Camarena
John Palmer RhodesFederal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
John Palmer RhodesFederal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent