whether-zavla-made-a-substantial-showing-of-a-denial-of-his-right-to-due-process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER ZAVLA MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF A DENIAL OF HIS RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS SECURED . UNDER FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STASTES CONSTITUTION ENCOURAGING THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS TO PROCEED FURTHER AND GRANT HIM THE COA. Il. WHETHER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS EXTENDS TO HABEAS CORPUS PETITIONER UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO A DEFENDANT WHO PLEAD GUILTY DURING TRIAL AND FILED HIS CLAIM PURSUANT 28 U.S.C. S 2255 PROCEEDINGS AFTER EXHAUSTING HIS DIRECT APPEAL AND LEARNING THAT HIS CO-DEFENDANTS CONVICTION WAS OVERTURNED AND ORDERED A NEW TRIAL DUE TO THE GOVERNMENT SUPPRESSION OF BRADY MATERIAL DURING THEIR THE PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL PROCESS REQUIRES EQUAL APPLICATION OF JUSTICE TO ALL THE DEFENDANTS WHOM DECIDED TO STAND TRIAL REGARDLESS THE LEGAL STAGE WHERE THE CLAIM WAS FIRSTLY RAISED UNDER DOCTRINE OF BRADY AND THIS COURT STARE DECICES CASES. Ill. _WHETHER DISTRICT COURT’S DECISION TO SUA SPONTE DISMISS HABEAS CORPS PETITIONS AFTER REFERING THE PETITIONS TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR 2255 PROCEEDINGS ANDREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS VIOLATES THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATE ACT AND THE RULES GOVERNING 2255 PROCEEDINGS TO HAVE PARTIES CONTROVERTED FACTS AND ISSUES BE HEARD AND RESOLVED THROUGH EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS. tH