No. 20-6946
IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process procedural-reasonableness sentence-reduction sentencing statutory-interpretation substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) restrict appellate courts' authority to review the procedural and substantive reasonableness of a denial of a motion for a sentence reduction or modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) restrict appellate courts’ authority to review the procedural and substantive reasonableness of a denial of a motion for a sentence reduction or modification under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)? ii
Docket Entries
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
Supplemental brief of petitioner Barry Cashin filed.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-12
Reply of petitioner Barry Cashin filed. (Distributed)
2021-04-28
Brief of respondent United States filed.
2021-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 28, 2021.
2021-03-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2021 to April 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 29, 2021.
2021-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2021 to March 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Barry Cashin
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent