No. 20-6947
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment civil-rights collateral-review due-process intellectual-disability montgomery-v-louisiana procedural-law retroactive-application retroactivity supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must Florida apply Hall v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 1986 (2014) retroactively and review a claim of intellectual-disability on the merits for cases on collateral-review, pursuant to Montgomery-v-Louisiana, 136-S-Ct-718-(2016)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Must Florida apply Hall v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 1986 (2014) retroactively and review a claim of intellectual disability on the merits for cases on collateral review, pursuant to Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016)? ii
Docket Entries
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-05-12
Reply of petitioner Alphonso Cave filed.
2021-04-26
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2021-02-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 26, 2021.
2021-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2021 to April 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)
Attorneys
Florida
Amitabh Agarwal — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Amitabh Agarwal — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent