No. 20-6950

In Re John Poullard

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure constitutional-challenge due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure rule-60-motion standing subject-matter-jurisdiction void-judgment
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the United States District Court of Appeals 5th Circuit Clerk of Court refuse to file my FRCP(60)(B)(4) motion for relief from the 2-1 decision judgment?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Can the United States District Court of Appeals 5" Circuit Clerk of Court refuse to file my FRCP(60)(B)(4) motion for relief from the 2-1 decision judgment, when that judgment was made by the United States Court of Appeal 5" Circuit and the judgment is being attacked as violation of the United States Const. Amend. 14 and as void in violation af U.S. Const. Art. 3 Section 1, 2, et seg defect to notice, a defect in court of appeal subject matter jurisdiction is an obligation for the U.S. Conrt of Appeals 5" Cir. Judges. See Bender v. Williamsport Area School District 106 S.Ct. 1326? 2. Can a FRCP 60(B)(4) Motion for Relief of the U.S. Court of Appeals 5" Circuit Judgment as void be filed directly in the U.S. Court of Appeal 5" Cir. when that is the court that made the void judgment. 3. Do the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana have subject . matter jurisdiction over a FRCP 60B)(4) motion attacking a judgment made by U.S. Court of Appeal 5" Circuit as void? PARTIES John Poullard petitioner, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk of Court for the U.S. Court of Appeals 5" Cir., Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry 2

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-01-13
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

In Re John Poullard
John Poullard — Petitioner
John Poullard — Petitioner