Does ignorance of the law bar petitioner from having right to be heard when a miscarriage of justice has occurred?

Questions Presented Questions Concerning Writ 1) Dees the exceptional circumstances within this Writ reach the level required for this Court to use its discretionary powers ? 2) Dees ignorance of the law , bar Petitioner from having Right to be Heard , when a Miscarriage of Justice has occurred P 3) When a Petitioner can show innocence was overcome by Constitutional violations , does Petitioner have Right to be Heard in post conviction proceedings ? Questions Concerning Actual Ianocence and Constitutional Violation Claims 4) Was defense counsel Ineffective for failing to use evidence — of innocence in closing argument ? 5) Was defense counsel Leeffective for failing to have trial court weigh trustworthiness of Hearsay testimony ? 6) Did trial court deprive Petitioner 6*Amend. Right +o present defense P 7) Do police violate 4t* Amend. by employing citizen to take alcohol to mans home , get him drunk, and then question him about victim ? 8) Was defense counsel Ineffective for failing to object to collection and use of false story ? 9) Was it Prosecutor Misconduct, when trial Prosecutor used specific statements from false story ,to convict Defendant ? 10.) Does all Appeal and Habeas courts use of false statements,as overwhelming evidence , to deny appeals and Habeas Corpus , deny Petitioner of Due Process ? 2 Questions Presented Cont. Il) Did the trial Prosecutor commit Fraud Upon The Court ? 12) Once a Prosecutor commits Fraud Upon The Court ina state criminal trial, has Malicious Prosecution occurred , and is the trial void ? 13) Was defense counsel Ineffective for failing te alert Court to prosecuteral Fravd Upon The Court ? 1) Was defense counsel Ineffective for deliberately hiding newspaper article that prejudiced Defendants trial P 15) Did trial Court deprive Defendant fair trial by failing to inquire into jury exposure to prejudicial news paper P Ib) Upon consideration by courts for Habeas , is Petitioner entitled to claim of Newly Discovered Evidence when defense counsel withheld prejudicial item from Petitioner P 1) Does “trial strategy" protect defense counsel from Ineffectiveness , when counsel deliberately protected the prosecutions case from presenting harmful witness ? 3) Was defense counsel Ineffective for failing to object — to Prosecutor failing +o establish authentication of D.W.A. blood withdrawling P 19) Is defense counsel Ineffective for failing to object to Dog Handler as expect witness ? 3 1. Petitioner , Defendant , Adam Pelletier 1006145 address , Sussex II State Prison 24427 Musselwhite Drive , Waverly , VA 23894 2. Respondent , Att. Gen. Mark Herring address , 900 E.Main St. , Richmond , VA 23249 3. Lead Defense Counsel \ T.Lloyd Snook oddress , PO.Box 2486 , Charlottesville , VA 22902 4. Defense Counsel , Fletcher HarKraider address . 5 Trial Prosecutor \ Den Short . address , 6. Trial Judge , Vohn R, Cullen address : ; TABLE OF CONTENT Cover Po. 1 Heading Pg. 2-3 Questions Presented Pg. Ys