Whether the court of appeals erred in dismissing the appeal where the conviction and sentence were unconstitutional because Hobbs Act robbery is not a 'crime of violence' under §924(c)(3)(A) when it can be committed through mere fear of future injury to property

QUESTION PRESENTED. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DISMISSING THE APPEAL WHERE THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE HOBBS ACT ROBBERY IS NOT A “CRIME OF VIOLENCE” UNDER §924(c)(3)(A) WHEN IT CAN BE COMMITTED THROUGH MERE FEAR OF FUTURE INJURY TO PROPERTY. i