Whether the lack of 'specific' terms within a written agreement should prevent state court officers from imposing terms of servitude

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Regarding the application of 13 Amendment protection, whether the lack of “specific” terms within a written agreement should prevent state court officers from imposing terms of servitude and whether the imposition of any measure of servitude, except as punishment for a crime, absent a “specific” written agreement constitutes “Involuntary Servitude”. Il. Whether any state court forum which imposes servitude upon one Citizen for the benefit of another without “specific” written concessions renders that state’s forum Constitutionally “Inadequate” in protecting Citizen’s Rights within the related body | . of law in which the state court forum is attempting to impose servitude. IH. Whether the Constitutional Right to Equal Protection of Law requires the Federal Supreme Court to equally protect all Citizens of this Nation through the establishment of a precedent ruling to close loopholes which have allowed inconsistent enforcements of Involuntary Servitude from one state to another. IV. Whether the imposition of any “Servitude” by any state officer, which is not supported by “specific” written terms except as punishment for a crime, should be deemed outside Constitutional Jurisdiction and should “Disqualify” that officer of judicial immunity in connection with being held responsible for the deprivation of a Citizen’s Constitutional Right to Life, Liberty and Property. 2