No. 20-6983
Demarcus Cole v. Kevin Myers, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cellular-phone-evidence certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure fourth-amendment habeas-corpus illegal-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress trial-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a Certificate of Appealability on trial counsel was ineffective, when counsel failed to file a pre-trial Motion to Suppress, illegally obtained evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a Certificate of Appealability on trial counsel was ineffective, when counsel failed to file a pre-trial Motion to Suppress, illegally obtained evidence recovered from Mr. Cole cellular phone? i
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-17
Waiver of right of respondent Kevin Myers to respond filed.
2020-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Kevin Myers
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent