Whether the State of Arizona violated the Defendant's rights to due process under the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution and under specific Arizona state law and Rules of Criminal Procedure, including Brady/Discovery violations and structural errors

No question identified. : Q penfonet bal Q cent! A+ ie 0 yeshe ORD E caer iho 4 olze K ws) Pr LAW KPed\ ve Ste yw A ACK esen A ewe. ye pmens Gre ¥ea Ny Foren yw whe ne bab A c\c en) th Oc N4 le Coane Kk yw our M ev R. CAG p nth & @ ke Shin aicd Athy CHhin WO ie U y Ui te posit Pre fic oli olat Awe! 5 9 Lc 7k Seateln C wrth @ WA slope er wh wo Elen Ven gized on st he ee i Nie d Aan is eo oF a Obs Bo Semediately From eres e 4 uC Y De pew oulie te erv nA Q com 8 Fecloss be He Fro the 3 wale We CA 28 cite wocatea b vest pk LO WA rye eet POO Ace rPNA ber No b Ques eves ty Rv eect 2E& chee du eng Co t wht Yy Sypetee Adi PL? \e sha sae ete. O10 & Kory wy ene as thes ¢ oF val M 0 ExPect eWKteyy Sidenee th rented Be poss pier Packt AN 8 ford, SN e. Avian ve Ve men cron © ~Y Prov UNper Com Gb se © fo AG wd HYC\e i Stake Olah wins Ariz. MUN Gy ye) q ie i @ in $y af A , rel. gupse on R vcak ent gosto cANU iN th van Decent Aree), Pees Ex Beerin Sup between wrdevee Dueck a re) \ cv Qn > ~~ . g Re! in tv ISS a Cure SS @ nto pese One D a gcatycal sini > Wer pkebt s\) Prosscat th ¢ veo ense ft ene jee pel hors etonn\( 4ven up C rhe own ee iypunesss tf Cont heshow Geo Ne ¢ BND Presente Bin Cert fut Abort uel Berle Jo nah ct Fressied Ry 000} aOR ot RN cove pus he 5} ne ottot vin A ed ral ght te pov viki Roe py P Sb Vai SIWA Dek vivo M20 on (Soeete? an wie tose spring 33 tesa aN ind “e Revised th Predudr’ ob) ; Ano & ING’ cro? I RO aNeT, Bess) PAN v) mei racedute aw) J q\zon Qv ) ole wrol & mud . entl rit) Plicd + ne rc OKe 4 A ul pe iv an Ror rosen ao ko priors anenty a\o eres ste bef AGL eee 8.200) sey retiat epee prison ot tah ieoepene Qe v.35 Sars, SO) mics, being Reset irae Fee Gt rnen a : Rares Proced NG 1s brou AF 5 prest teil BPA mal of SS ety: cE Nuke rn wie eee uted Fer Bx sensed ieee fees 6 . . } secuho pace) } ci he 9 wery toane eo A pmes wh: 2 lOLS ghvene fe ~" nek dvd om Violet peed Aenbigy NWNG uroladirs while Ceaed ae {ne Pp Ke Cpe i) st yon oF y inn oud A the ind yer DP & repr ONRe Pro“ sem E rot dwt UCie 1120 veh ec Arto oe mt sue pan Role fon Soe sreece viol 5 ae Sane S aon 3h une Stee. ae \v Dee eee Mu Pease Boner: sy srthbeasie “ aw Dus sien S Be Eres wy ona ras of eogh Decal of evAmenit af ~ Oo pee 5 $e hee is Nien val wi thre 4 40 Fri of Righ al? / co~ 8 clause cial Clouse Ts ash be ir) Sra aia: S Yo self ete. g pusel ACY Wis A OF fh eee 10 Gays ie lear bi pl, Awe fon FRR Prateek 5 Aen wcsome Va Rens ene oe ee For ecard Ne jae, of x Ve ened ot wo Prepare wp eowived Coat tens ed es ae oe Von AAV ULS Qvesho FY P10 Two Sigdctucal ERRORS OCCURS Due fo A Brady [Discovery \Yrolahwn iN cluding improper Arntndment gf inchdtmend AWD A steecturel Dis cavecy Violptions /E RRO OCCU When) Prosecator, Suppressed, Favorpble Buidenae Eitnec willfully OR INAdvertenHy OF Onpercing Frotual Eudence Were A Predvdice Rrsved because thy Proseaotom Celled witness Creseucia Sanckee to festiFy buk Never Provided a signed wrtter OR Crp) Recorded sloremend oF Hhe Accuspion on Ure Ople af ne Acovrecl Acres) to impenoh Pratinalwihess . Stekemedds During deghimony ? Did Sine of AnzoNA Vrolebe Pre Defendawhs Gants fy Due Process UnPor the Sth Amendment al the United Stabe’ Conshtubyoy) And UNbec specific ion stote jaw Amer Rules of Crmwal P rocedure 1 Sal @) (1) Axe Rule 15. TOAD Coushrtohig Sackioas of Secvecly hmvrbidg o@ Exclodoy Hhak teral Fedhimony AM boqelaer Pye the Brody /Di gover Nolation 2 : | }