No. 20-6993

Clarence Jackson v. Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-licensing bar-admission civil-rights due-process equal-protection legal-discrimination legal-profession racial-discrimination systemic-racism white-supremacy
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-02-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the background established in the petition allow for Caucasians holding 98% of power and wealth to engage in racism, fraud, and theft to maintain 98% Caucasian attorney representation?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ; 1. Does the background that is established in the recently filed Petition for Writ Certiorari in this court at case number 20-5544 the 98 plus percent of the power and wealth that Caucasians hold verses the virtually powerless less than the 2 percent of the same by generic . black Americans allows for this 98 plus percent representation of Caucasians as Attorneys in the United States to engage in racism , fraud ,theft and any unlawful or illegal tactic necessary to keep this prima facie case of 98 plus percent of Attorney licenses totally Caucasian and no matter what the legal system says or do ,even after a judgement against them for racism, fraud , theft and anything else imaginable , this extreme white supremacy superiority : trademark ( law license ) will not be disturb ,especially to correct this injustice that occurs routinely against the majority of black law license candidates that reaches the bar anywhere and will subvert any legal challenge process even after judgment by not providing discovery or anything else required under the rules when under law they must so any cover up of the racism and fraud specifically against generic blacks as presented herein , especially men will be exposed as in this total case and lets see what happens now ? i

Docket Entries

2021-03-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent DC Office of the Mayor, et al. to respond filed.
2020-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Clarence Jackson
Clarence Jackson — Petitioner
Clarence Jackson — Petitioner
DC Office of the Mayor, et al.
Lucy Elizabeth PittmanOffice of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent
Lucy Elizabeth PittmanOffice of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Respondent