Ryan C. Lander v. United States
— is it covsrmcp 0*' 1- 7c» Hos^cux^ cin^^s r>^ PoaudOidABM^
0TH6& CQiMes UjufteH The "lATfzesTrrz Coaimgacg * cuuf^r t^CA^er in&
CofopiAT&K- ok oTk&ft £&utPM€*j~r ^A5 MA^^^A^ThASA o^r of ^7? 3
/5 IT LAWFUL 7Z> Cotopet A ClTltt^ TZ> R&LI/OQUi^H Vi^K FbuPTH
Ai*<Ssj^g+>~C /UfiffT n> UAjkFAt*vh8C£~ SEARCH e? utTH&UT FI ATT &PLmAtl/rq
'JHtGia. RifcrtT, l 45 I/O A>I£4 a)J>A f
do MI a> lAk/h 5 {J10CAT& THC Oi<CCR<> &M4AtCG$ &U/UT
OUR. GrouGRvfo&Krr TUT Cc^^TWT^t 1 ? \K>n
~'tyb fU& 6IOTRIcT CouRT \jiola TS. A^ SIXTH Amc/u^A&T A/6HT T> au*j<$&L.
M/hdVi/u^ Mh '"at&Rm&i t A/*& AppaitoTlAJq /j&is& CouuSeL. ( FbR "
A C^T uioT Op TtoyzRe-TrJ OR £>*? blReap#4 AT 7z ftM-se*.£*2 FI ft rr AToT
^ li *fUfa? PleA AC iRCgAiCmT AA&C kAJOUIS<s\tLj ft,ub U/LC/A^Otf A*J& A«T
CoOR Cgb t Al Airv&H&j TUT OM/oiUkC moTI^S* Ca^T&^lT>
l Hftb e5/6,AJ&b Th C PISA i UHiCH lAjToRMATd^ Cuoald. A& umTVHm<T \tJTLU£/jC6± A*f blClS/d<0 TO PLSaI l)lb Cou/jnk PfZtfkfcL fb PllAj Aa/&
k$i TaTHCR T& fRTTSkRT 44Tf MAC€ VvF PLCA ax>t hk*wi4ylt 1
loU^^h H 7'o'—
*" &JlbGA>Ce W MV\ CftSC ACTf jljC 5TAA/M^bT OF THC L/puj
AS ILLEGAL, OR Vh THC: A6)6* T? 4*/6
Is it constitutional to prosecute citizens for cybercrime under the interstate-commerce clause