Is it constitutional to prosecute citizens for cybercrime under the interstate-commerce clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ~~ 1S IT ConmsTtTupiowAl Te PENERACC YY PRosecuTE CITIZEUS FOR PaRUIGRAPAY And OTHER CRIMES undeR THE “laqeesTaTE Commerce” CUUSE Simply bECAUSE THE CompuTGR.OR OTHER EQUIPMENT WAS MANUFACTURES OUT OF Ware t — 1s iT LAWFUL JO Compel A CITIZEN TO RELINQUISH THEIR FouRTH AMEN MGYT RIGHT To Ui Ressen rele SEARCHES WITHOUT FIRST Sx Planing, THEIR RIGHTS ; 4S 1 MIRANSA F ~ Bo MAN digIey Minimums UlocATE THE CHeckKS Awh bMANCES $WICT nT «OUR GoUERNMENT £4 ThE Consz7tWTIoN 2% —~ Pld THE ble7R{cT CouRT locate My SIXTH Amewd MET RIGHT TR Gunsel “BO FIRST NoT REMOVING My ATIORNEY AND APPoinTING NEL Couusec , FOR . 2 A CowPlicl OF TureREsT/ OR BY biRECTG ME Te PRecceds “PRo-se"! " — WAS mh Plea AGREEMEAT page " Knowsi a Lo Aud WiIWGe4 | Aub AeT COER CEd, bY my ATORNEY [yITHECAING THE Ommibhs' sporiows! ConTeWTS From me uwTtic | Had SIGNES THE PLEA, LWHICH 1uPoRMATION Lyould d Have Iweluences my decisias TO PLEA® Did Couusels pressute to Pls, Ano Wstv, hy FaTUerR To PRERIRE ME, Make THE PLEA Hor " karows ity beg A fittingly "2 — Joes THE CuIwerce W mh CASE MEET TNE ST ANAARSS OF THE CHU AS ILLEGAL, OR YIN THE AGEXTS 4nd PRISE CUTER TAKE AMVANT HAE oF "SCARE Tactics" Any THE THREAT OF AN OUERGUMNetINE MAXIMiM SESTENCE TD CoERCE A PlEA AEREEMENT,