No. 20-7011

Hemmingway Mukora Saisi v. Carolyn Murray, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference due-process equal-protection protection-claim self-defense stare-decisis state-criminal-procedure state-officials
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to due process and equal protection were violated by the heightened pleading standard applied to his self-defense claim

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ESTIONS pRESENTRD — 4: , LE@AL AKGumM_NT CG, F,, cCaeaNnchusi EN _ 2 INDEX To _ ApPRNDIX A. Lertae’s Feom Kényad KMBREsy WASHINGTON De = To: B. ALFARO eeTIz — ESSEX county COPRE CTIONS ~ DIRECTOR . Go Jupak micifal prTAolLA ~ Kssex cantly AT, DJuogK PETAR VASQIEC — Essex cowly NI EF. Noticé of claim — GLENN FERGURSON ~ CEO = Ann KLEIN FoRENSICS, TRENTIN NJ . Capies Jo Gan: CHRIS CHRISTIE & . enya Qwt RNMENT NAA] keerh Fe My Post ConvicTion BRIERE by Tahn M Mandan my INFORMAL APPEAL BRIEF Te THIRD <iReal T Gq > PP ae of OPAL : He TypeeEMENT AF TRIAD CIRCUIT qT. fhmended svik eQrinsk Reperdenks. a, met tan Foy teaves ty Proce Tn Fata pap ERS! Ke Ror ao oF = “SENIee (NTN Aden Gere) 7 RS&X supe coral) ors INDEX TO AgpENDIX_ Buphs me enRT chsk&s SITKD: FARMER We BRENNAN C1994) | Qo BxENS Vie SIX UNKNowN Def eMDANTS (1971) 8. collins Vv ly & HaeveR HeigtTs Bos UW'S’ 15, 1AF MA Sch’ 1O€L 1064 (49a) 4A BAKER V! WINGO Hof us 514 (1442) , 5' Poa@GeTT Ww UNITKD STATES 5S, US: G47 (199a) TH ie» CIRCUIT CASE 3 4) NicoLR HERBELK Ve Booval oF NAZARETH Not 183424 NI suPREME cotURT CASK: STATE We Roptiqugu 195 NV 165, 444 he2d 197 (2008) sO STATEMENT of THE MATTER PRR SENTRD . This Petution challenge s 4h e hetghtencd ple mbios stan Que applic & 20 my dui k BAS A Nod state arycia|s . tah o Kept mn & impr sane & fF ov F Y cars (sev) Wty ova dei al on Se SWjecke L me do Tarts because \ ¥ efFu se ko o\ ea Bvihy noble Invoke Qo, my wlahh ‘Ko a \vry kei a\ since the firsk Ray of my are sk on Miy oH “a ao8. The Diskick carey an &, Cort of appeal — tHVPD ciReviT, ove iq : essence weeheh wy pleaLinds os Leper Last s mak on For Riscot ery, My pleadings Qso nok have ® be Floated’ Woe Speapye constituhy ona amen SLi enk Sepsivation foe he cary x4 Ai scecn The eppew ens harm an & INGUSTICA., & Procedivally, tT was aweske &y on) March aan A004 OF her being Leuk all a akkockeS by THRER tNOds on he Fy onk SK 209 oF oy apotin ent in JSersy cay NQCc oREY DANNIS coment |v SENN 0) & lige Sentence wm» he Sk ake x G cov Ay for knwo asi2r\y mur Sle 's in Ado TAmES chARK Sho Was on ‘probation peink bulleks. ands SEFE REY stnepa 2D Qecense&, Whe hadu josk ben released From Shake ps so0 ond hake w length» vee ark et Wo\enk <edimes. No officials in 4 y Qosen county avested an SL 1 Pv son e SL Ne as Hox ah | was NOT enkisl|eM +o SALE DAFANSE os cokgje L ok Nosh 20; 3-4. Self bLefense Was NoT waisedly even Bi 0.4) ket a\ ans ssbseQenk Mveck <0 sl an & Nd SUP RE M6 SoOoRT cer KEL oabon . The NG SUPREME couRT Skake Ve Rophauew 145 N'Y: 165, 44% Ae Qd 14 F (aoog) effi me A the heeistan of an apPpellake ody Hh ak reverse Xk, on be xermoan Le Qe th e edn e CAS @& Wak AvaNe @ he USe F Ferce Ao prohe ck hin Serf : Defendonk Rearkiauez Inc} Lenkall y Was ow eske de on 3 Rie by the Sane Wo son catinky Pros econ 5 appice ond the Reval evra! s , Gre similar dp the Rackles' , Lepleye 30 Har eomiep on . The only db FF erence is ihak | am fies con — Keoyen onde MY: RoRe guez i3 Nin ext eah | This ip essence tvaly Bak es TH Loekine Ff STARR Decisis For eNen my Wen akh eo ey MR: AN TH Any GoAPLANO sri& a Me thak | Was on SEV P) SL vn gcakerfe | AP stear an ihak | Was Hein 4 tk 6obe dLeporked. | @ T Was on freok pages or ners pagers m Kenyon on JL Kenyan s an b> 4 £ anni\y ox \arae Were shockels . T. contachke d the FEL neve dake an boy \ake Ra sek wn meter he UsS*s '’_ o (her Sisker came Fram We UdG on do & Wr oh e aw prote eh \ ekKer x the American Bmbassy In N atv ob Kenya. Dak came on Avausk A0oF an SU | Was xeleas edh fs on NO shakey pe son on parol « on ochober gat 2002: while w the U'S-5 The ae oo brazen akhempk x0 Kill ie Dads wWenk back heme th 000k on Zn my sisker TJacaueline fod dL Or & feak “y Former At} ernew Me? Antony Gv a\and Was mK Quiel a 4 £6 oN the? Parole office why | ba@a'k Deen dle por he KS this [ko Bhim Making a\\ e nation thak | Kak calle an, threatene Le “him ark this \eSi #® oy Jaret, Dente A228 RZ xears” who er QUESTIONS PAR SBN TAD A+ Were me conshene}

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent Alfaro Ortiz to respond filed.
2020-12-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Alfaro Ortiz
Alan RuddyOffice of the Essex County Counsel, Hall of Record, Respondent
Alan RuddyOffice of the Essex County Counsel, Hall of Record, Respondent
Hemmingwy Mukora Saisi
Hemmingway M. Saisi — Petitioner
Hemmingway M. Saisi — Petitioner