Michael A. Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy
Whether the district court and appellate court erred in denying the appellant's due process, confrontation, examination, privileges, and protections in a federal antitrust case involving allegations of price-fixing, obstruction-of-justice, and racketeering
QUESTIONS PRESENTED . I, On District Court acceptance of appellant’s $505 filing fee can 9" Circuit : Order appeal CLOSED forgetting intake and review of compulsory briefs? Il. In15 U.S.C. § 1 Intel Inside® price fix controversy can in-region District | and Appellant Courts deny a federal auditor engaged by U.S. Congress at . | 15 U.S.C. § 5 cognizable § 15, enlisted by attorneys of the Federal Trade ; ; | Commission as case matter discovery aid and consent order monitor too validate said theft his Constitution 14" guarantee, too establish opposition | network frivolous manufacturer denied his a) due process, confrontation, | . examination, privileges, protections? Where defendants and under their. . color of law, defame the auditor retained by Congress at Constitution 9" suspect to quash discovery 18 USC §§ 1505, 1512, 1513, 1516, 1519, 1961. | b) Can Judges deny equity on associate technique of repeating errors? | c) To send the federal monitor auditor in circles encroaching civil rights? d) To cover up commission of felonies cognizable by courts of United States? | e) Too defraud the United States at 18 U.S.C. § 1371? | II. In same civil controversy can District and Appellant Courts deny 14° ; amendment guarantee to quash speech? Thereby conceal the corporate defendant’s reliance on California anti-SLAPP too libel a federal auditor , : engaged in Congressional policy administration, defendants reversing who is public operator too cover up their enterprise organized crime infiltration | ; detrimental to United States, States of United States, Citizens of the United 7 States, commerce on affirmative antitrust determinations; FTC v Intel Corp. ) Docket 9341 and EUCC 37.990 v Intel Corp., on Federal and State Agent’s discoveries 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2 cognizable § 15 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, 4, 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1371, 1956, 1957, and pursuant interstate commerce at 18 | US.C. § 1962(c) cognizable § 1964(c) ? 2