No. 20-7016

Andrew David Bruins, II v. Michele Whitman, Associate Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-provisions civil-procedure civil-rights court-proceeding due-process mandate relief remedies standing statutory-interpretation undue-burden
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the act or process of accommodating or accommodative information establish when court proceedings are deemed?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. The a ppropriate question: does the kick of rundate of the Institution trwavols visting renewal Yobifcation and or Approval before resumption oF a dléscypprovanl Lnsti be remedies of a Cubic. intresé? — a. The approprete Queshon » does the oct or pracesS of of actommedating or ACCOmmadadive informoton , aly establish when court proceeding are femed ° i. The uppropricite Questin does provisions Hat vetlect +echwue log cal acvancement in the le a OF ancillary cad and Servite lit under a Speci€ic requicement for determing the exstence of undue financial and Adminisha tive lourolens 7 } we The appropricite question. cbes wmmates cand dun .inmotes Vv Similary Situate 7

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2021)

Attorneys

Andrew David Bruins, II
Andrew David Bruins II — Petitioner
Andrew David Bruins II — Petitioner