No. 20-7024

Randy Macario Ancheta v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-924c certificate-of-appealability circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-sentencing due-process hobbs-act mandatory-minimum statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is whether, to make Hobbs Act robbery “fit” the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) crime-of-violence physical force clause definition, the Circuits interpret Hobbs Act robbery too narrowly by requiring violent force as an element of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. ii

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-29

Attorneys

Randy Ancheta, et al.
Wendi L. OvermyerOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent