No. 20-7024
Randy Macario Ancheta v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924c certificate-of-appealability circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-sentencing due-process hobbs-act mandatory-minimum statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is whether, to make Hobbs Act robbery “fit” the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) crime-of-violence physical force clause definition, the Circuits interpret Hobbs Act robbery too narrowly by requiring violent force as an element of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. ii
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis
Attorneys
Randy Ancheta, et al.
Wendi L. Overmyer — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent