Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in affirming the District Court's order dismissing Petitioner's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 without determining the actions of Appellee were (i) frivolous, (ii) failed to state a claim on which relief was granted, or (iii) sought monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | . AL HeTHteR THe OLS. Coort oF Appeals Gu cie,) (Ek IND AFFIRMING THe Dismier Court — ORDER IN SDISNISSING “FeTITIONLY’S Complainr “FoRuant TO 9BUSC. 15S) woirtoor DEreeMining . _. THe Actions of APPEL... CG) is Fedlods of Malicious ; | (i') Fails TO STATE A Claim on cokied RevieF Mas “RE SPONTED 5 or Gi) Sack MoveTary REGicr Rapinsr A DE Resco GoHO 1S INMINONE From Suck Rever. | Make IF STATE QUDCie(s) ARE jE Feom InsFeingING THe Cousntotiosac Rights oF DeFardoS sin CASES TO.CaHICH THEY preside CONER TP |