No. 20-7032

Salvador Delrio v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-02-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: courier courier-status criminal-procedure due-process mitigating-role sentencing sentencing-guidelines speculative-inference speculative-inferences u.s.s.g.-3b1.2
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What weight should a court give to a defendant's essential role as a mere courier when determining a mitigating-role adjustment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. What weight should a court give to a defendant’s essential role as a mere courier when determining a mitigating-role adjustment? 2. Doesa district court violate U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 and a defendant’s due process right to be sentenced on accurate information when it denies a mitigating-role adjustment based on speculative inferences?

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 5, 2021)

Attorneys

Salvador Delrio
Andrea Renee St. JulianLaw Offices of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner
Andrea Renee St. JulianLaw Offices of Andrea Renee St. Julian, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent