Does an overview of facts collected at trial, sentencing, restitution, direct and collateral review, (and from startling new evidence), which exposes violations of Jencks, Brady, and Giglio (knowing use of perjured testimony) 'put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the . . verdict' (Wearry v. Cain, 2016), even for a homosexual?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . _ i. Does an overview of facts collected at trial, sentencing, restitution, direct and collateral review, (and from startling new evidence), which exposes violations of Jencks, Brady, and Giglio (knowing use of perjured testimony) "put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the . . verdict" (Wearry v. Cain, 2016), even for a homosexual? (Evidence,