No. 20-705

Chris Jaye v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process federal-courts first-amendment judicial-discretion judicial-immunity petition-rights pleading-standards standing
Key Terms:
Takings
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the US Court of Federal Claims and US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit acting in opposition to controlling law (Erickson vu. Pardus, Johnson v. City of Shelby) by implementing its own pleading-standard

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Has the US Court of Federal Claims and US Court : of Appeals for the Federal Circuit acting in opposition to controlling law (Erickson vu. Pardus, Johnson v. City of Shelby) by implementing its own ~ pleading standard different from other circuits? 2. Does a federal judge have the right to impose his/her own will and wants into a citizen’s complaint to alter the facts alleged as a basis for dismissal? Can a federal judge impose presumed limits on the jurisdiction of a federal court to deprive a citizen the right to petition her own government (First Amendment)? 3. What remedies exist in the law when lies are not corrected and not addressed in the record? What remedies exist in the law when a judge (protected by judicial immunity) illegally dismisses a valid case? How does a citizen remedy this wrong and deprivation of a right (First Amendment) caused by the lies of a judge? ; ; {

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2020)
2019-12-30
Application (19A720) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 23, 2020.
2019-12-17
Application (19A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2019 to February 23, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Chris Jaye
Chris Ann Jaye — Petitioner
Chris Ann Jaye — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent