Whether the Indiana courts erred in denying the petitioner's request for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel

No question identified. : ee forelly Defeesies Ge suct seni, A. Yicsie ee Onrd Rerlinsc to siete end cers? jo —-R@ [|Woeesinee Dekardastis Adwally Tawa — fof Se ceteoe ne_chesageh 20 __ @.@wWoedeee Dekadost was denied woe es Seosive Assistance of Conusel uieen) _ [Coomse) Catled\ te Fnestgate Woe heue — Bdewttty aud age of a “allececd minoe ieee —<al deine Sine Congr Comscucivelyy Acnemrdect __ ee hes INdiana in A case Lartee FSQUAR (ea) _ geal cedree oe, Iisicicy Coock Setledse —_— Ppacride oe hey wstin aa adequate [rosaenclioad ust gesrecides Mine Tinpeadamente __O. al LSnedinee Soe, Naser Cott cated toy ict _Jniousig Boe Magsrese Sidee te cheliver — | ackere chessytiug oe. VexVonets §2aSS jot E LLL Liners Soe_DBisneicr Cootreeted toy woe loader § 28 R.c0) woes Boe’ ae nti? mail age Sa __ : a ee | ee — ee _ | ee a | _ | a — ee | a ee ence _ PO a | en yc ee _