No. 20-7052
Joshua Wright v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion mitigating-factors procedural-reasonableness reasonableness sentencing substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 151-month sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Where the court failed to address Petitioner’s mitigating arguments and failed to justify its sentence, whether the 151-month sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable.
Docket Entries
2021-03-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Joshua Wright
united States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent